- Research highlight
- Open Access
Mapping meiotic breaks: Spo11 oligonucleotides precisely mark the spots
© BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Accepted: 28 April 2011
- Published: 28 April 2011
Initiation sites for meiotic recombination have now been precisely mapped across the budding yeast genome using a widely applicable deep-sequencing approach.
- Down Syndrome
- Meiotic Recombination
- Nucleosome Occupancy
- Chromosome Missegregation
- Meiotic DSBs
The consecutive cell divisions of meiosis precisely halve the cellular chromosome complement to produce haploid gamete cells. Prior to first division, replicated paternal and maternal chromosomes (homologs) become intimately associated before segregating to opposite poles of the cell. During the second division, sister-chromatids separate much as they do during mitosis.
The template-directed DNA repair process called homologous recombination has fundamental roles in the pairing and accurate segregation of homologs during the first meiotic division. Multiple recombination events are initiated along each chromosome and the ensuing homologous pairing and strand-exchange reactions align the homolog pairs and facilitate their intimate synapsis. Following synapsis, a fraction of the recombination events are completed with an associated exchange of chromosome arms. These crossovers physically tether the homologs and allow them to attain a stable bipolar connection to the spindle apparatus, thereby facilitating accurate homolog segregation. Without a crossover, paternal and maternal homologs are at risk of missegregation. The aneuploid gametes that result from homolog missegregation lead to gene dosage imbalances in the zygote that cause pregnancy miscarriage and chromosomal diseases such as Down syndrome. Meiotic recombination also has a less immediate, although no less critical, role in determining patterns of inheritance and shaping the genome over evolutionary time.
It has long been known that rates of meiotic recombination vary widely across genomes. Most notably, at a fine scale, genetic maps are punctuated by discrete 'hotspots' with extended intervening regions of greatly suppressed recombination. Recombination hotspots have fundamental consequences for genome evolution, patterns of inheritance and genetic studies: hotspots create intervals of high linkage disequilibrium (LD) flanked by sharp transitions where LD breaks down; this limits population diversity and drives the archetypal block structure of haplotypes. Thus, the precise identification of recombination hotspots is key for describing their impact on LD and for understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie their distribution and activity. A new genomic approach to precisely map sites where recombination is initiated moves us towards these goals .
The first studies to map DSB sites on a large scale exploited the rad50S mutation, which blocks processing, leaving Spo11 attached to DSB ends (Figure 1b). This reagent allowed detection of accumulated DSB fragments by gel electrophoresis and Southern analysis, leading to a map of DSB hotspots along chromosome 3 of budding yeast . With the advent of microarray technology, DSBs accumulated in rad50S-like mutants could be mapped genome-wide [4, 5]. For these experiments, DNA probes were prepared from Spo11-DNA complexes that had been enriched by binding to glass fiber filters or by immunoprecipitating Spo11.
It was subsequently discovered that a subset of meiotic DSBs detected in wild-type cells fails to form in rad50S and related mutants. Although intriguing, this fact meant that DSB maps from rad50S-like mutants were inaccurate. To solve this problem, two groups simultaneously developed a strategy to enrich the single-stranded DNA formed at processed DNA ends, which was then used to prepare microarray probes [6, 7]. This approach used the dmc1 mutation, which blocks DSB repair after processing to produce single-stranded tails (Figure 1d). The resulting DSB maps were more biologically meaningful and provided considerable insight (discussed below), but have limited spatial and quantitative resolution because of microarray design, the dynamic range of hybridization signals, and the relatively large sizes of DSB-associated DNAs used as probes.
In 2005, the group of Scott Keeney confirmed the existence of Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes and showed that they are relatively stable and readily isolated from wild-type cells by immunoprecipitation of Spo11 . It was immediately obvious that the sequences of Spo11-oligonucleotides can precisely identify the sites of meiotic DSBs. These handy 'address tags' have now been used to produce perhaps the ultimate map of DSB sites in the budding yeast genome  (Figure 1c). By deep sequencing Spo11-oligonucleotides, Pan et al.  were able to quantitatively map DSBs across the genome at nucleotide resolution and with exquisite sensitivity.
In many ways, the Spo11-oligonucleotide DSB map  corroborates features inferred from other genomic and non-genomic analyses of DSB locations [3, 4, 6, 7]. However, the precise spatial and quantitative resolution of this map greatly extends our understanding of the features that underlie hotspot location and activity. For budding yeast, the meiotic DSB map is dictated by the fundamental organization of the genome, because the vast majority (98.2%) of Spo11-oligonucleotide sequences map to non-repetitive elements, primarily gene promoters where nucleosomes are relatively depleted and DNA is accessible to Spo11.
With 3,604 hotspots identified as clusters of Spo11-oligonucleotides, it seems that a majority of gene promoters have the potential to function as DSB hotspots. In addition, when analyzed over windows of several kilobases, DSB density positively correlates with GC content . This probably reflects the location of DSBs in chromatin loops; loops are relatively GC-rich whereas the loop bases associated with the homolog axes are relatively AT-rich .
Exceptions to the general patterns described above provide a more detailed picture of the meiotic DSB landscape, the factors that shape it and potential biological implications . First, 1.8% of DSBs occur in repetitive elements, including telomeres, rDNA, tRNAs and retrotransposons. Although DSBs are relatively suppressed in these elements, this class of breaks creates a significant risk of non-allelic recombination, which may cause chromosomal rearrangements, defective homolog pairing and chromosome missegregation.
Second, the sensitivity of deep sequencing reveals that the designation of any given site as a DSB hotspot is rather arbitrary. The ranked activities of DSB hotspots follow a striking continuum over a 410-fold range with no clear cut-off . Moreover, more than 10% of DSBs are not located in clear hotspots.
Third, although DSBs are generally suppressed around all centromeres, this effect varies for different chromosomes . Given that centromere-proximal crossovers are associated with chromosome missegregation , the authors  suggest that the distinct centromere-proximal DSB profiles of different chromosomes may differentially predispose them to segregation errors.
Fourth, location of DSB hotspots to gene promoters is not the rule because 4.8% of Spo11-oligo sequences map to non-promoter locations . Also, the majority of hotspots show clustering of Spo11 oligonucleotides (indicating cleavage sites) within a region of 189 bp on average. However, around 10% of hotspots are at least 500 bp wide and some show overlap with open reading frame sequences.
Pan et al.  also used deep sequencing to generate high-resolution maps of meiotic nucleosome positions. Comparison with the Spo11-oligonucleotide map showed that the widths of nucleosome-depleted regions positively correlate with the widths, and to some extent the activities, of DSB hotspots. Strikingly, DSBs form almost exclusively in non-nucleosomal DNA. However, a simple relationship between nucleosome occupancy and DSB activity is not observed: low nucleosome occupancy per se does not predict the locations or intensities of DSB hotspots. Thus, although absence of stable nucleosomes seems to be a prerequisite for Spo11 cleavage, it is not sufficient. Other factors, such as sub-chromosomal chromatin structure and location within a chromatin loop, seem to be dominant factors in hotspot activity. This inference is consistent with the studies of Lichten and colleagues , who showed that the activity of a defined DSB hotspot varied depending on its chromosomal location.
From the precise locations of the 2.2 million Spo11-oligonucleotide sequences, Pan et al.  showed that local DNA composition also influences Spo11 cleavage sites. As expected from previous studies, Spo11 does not have a specific recognition or cleavage site. However, sequence biases were detected: the 10 to 12 bp surrounding the cleavage site and predicted to be bound directly by Spo11 is relatively AT rich, predicting relatively narrow and deep helix grooves facing the bound Spo11 dimer. Cleavage favors sites immediately 3' of a C and disfavors G in the same position. Also, within a 32-bp core surrounding the Spo11 cleavage sites, a twofold rotational symmetry for complementary dinucleotide composition can be discerned, suggesting separate contributions of the flanking 'half sites' to Spo11 binding and/or cleavage. In addition, cleavage sites are negatively correlated with positioned nucleosomes. Similarly, Spo11 is generally occluded from cleaving sites where transcription factors are bound, even though the binding sites of several different transcription factors positively correlate with hotspot sites.
Although Spo11-oligonucleotide DSB maps  have much greater accuracy than those produced by other genomic DSB mapping approaches, there may still be some caveats to their interpretation. For example, Spo11-oligonucleotides appear to turn over as DSBs are repaired . Thus, the relative activities of DSB hotspots may be exaggerated depending on how rapidly DSBs at a given site are repaired. This artifact may be compounded by the fact that DSBs form at different times throughout the genome.
In addition, the probabilistic nature of DSB formation means that hotspot maps can tell us little about DSB regulation at the level of individual cells. In particular, understanding critical processes that control the number, distribution and timing of DSBs will require further development of techniques to detect DSBs in single cells.
The Spo11-oligonucleotide DSB mapping technique  should be broadly applicable to any species from which sufficient amounts of meiotic material can be obtained. This raises the exciting prospect of being able to contrast DSB maps across phyla and understand the impact of DSB hotspots on patterns of inheritance and genome evolution in individual species.
- Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau HG, Tischfield SE, Zhu X, Neale MJ, Jasin M, Socci ND, Hochwagen A, Keeney S: A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell. 2011, 144: 719-731. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S: Endonucleolytic processing of covalent proteinlinked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. 2005, 436: 1053-1057. 10.1038/nature03872.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baudat F, Nicolas A: Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 5213-5218. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5213.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gerton JL, DeRisi J, Shroff R, Lichten M, Brown PO, Petes TD: Inaugural article: global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 11383-11390. 10.1073/pnas.97.21.11383.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borde V, Lin W, Novikov E, Petrini JH, Lichten M, Nicolas A: Association of Mre11p with double-strand break sites during yeast meiosis. Mol Cell. 2004, 13: 389-401. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00034-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buhler C, Borde V, Lichten M: Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5: e324-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050324.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blitzblau HG, Bell GW, Rodriguez J, Bell SP, Hochwagen A: Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals double-stranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr Biol. 2007, 17: 2003-2012. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.066.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blat Y, Protacio RU, Hunter N, Kleckner N: Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation. Cell. 2002, 111: 791-802. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01167-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rockmill B, Voelkel-Meiman K, Roeder GS: Centromere-proximal crossovers are associated with precocious separation of sister chromatids during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2006, 174: 1745-1754. 10.1534/genetics.106.058933.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borde V, Wu TC, Lichten M: Use of a recombination reporter insert to define meiotic recombination domains on chromosome III of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 4832-4842.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar