Skip to main content

Table 1 Intersection between EDTA’s annotations and ground-truth annotations reveals EDTA’s tendency to misclassify nonLTR elements. Columns 2–7 show the percent of nonLTR elements annotated by EDTA in each of the six categories, including missed elements. The last column reports the percent of the genome occupied by nonLTR elements for each species

From: Accounting for diverse transposable element landscapes is key to developing and evaluating accurate de novo annotation strategies

Species

NonLTR

Unknown

DNA

Helitron

LTR

Missed

Genome

Zebrafish

2%

0%

80%

8%

6%

4%

7%

Zebra finch

0%

0%

60%

12%

9%

19%

4%

Mouse

0%

0%

48%

10%

20%

22%

28%

Chicken

0%

0%

57%

5%

25%

14%

7%

Rice

1%

0%

36%

33%

10%

20%

2%

Fruit fly

52%

0%

16%

1%

21%

10%

5%