Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Genome Biology

Fig. 4

From: The genetic mechanism of heterosis utilization in maize improvement

Fig. 4

Schematic illustration of the inference of additive, dominant, and epistatic QTLs. a Schematic illustration of the inference of additive and dominant QTLs represented by two genes, Gene A and Gene B, respectively, based on the differential patterns of GWAS signals across maternal and F1 populations, and the MPH of F1 hybrids. Strong (uppercase letter) and weak (lowercase letter) genotypes are defined by the corresponding strong and weak phenotype of the maternal lines, respectively. The paternal genome always provides a strong allele, marked in red. b Schematic illustration of the inference of epistatic QTLs represented by two genes, Gene C and Gene D, that are epistatically repressed by unknown Gene X in maternal genomes. When the maternal Gene x allele is combined with the dominant X allele from the paternal genome, Gene C and Gene D are activated and exhibit additive and dominant effects, respectively. D × A and D × D represent the epistatic effects of dominant by additive and dominant by dominant interactions, respectively. c A putative model for the interpretation of the regulatory interactions between Genes C and D, and Gene X. In the maternal genome, Gene X with homozygous, recessive alleles represses the transcription of Genes C and D (left panel). In the F1 hybrid, the dominant X allele from the paternal genome complements the recessive x allele of Gene X, and the repressive effect on Gene C and D is relieved. Then, transcription of Gene C and D is activated with different expression dosages based on their additive and dominant effects

Back to article page