Skip to main content

Articles

Page 133 of 150

  1. The number of genes predicted for the Caenorhabditis elegans genome is remarkably high: approximately 20,000, if both protein-coding and RNA-coding genes are counted. This article discusses possible explanations ...

    Authors: Jonathan Hodgkin
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:comment2008.1
  2. A report on the 18th Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB), Aarhus, Denmark, 20-25 August, 2001.

    Authors: David A Liberles
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports4026.1
  3. Searching for similarities between biological sequences is the principal means by which bioinformatics contributes to our understanding of biology. Of the various informatics tools developed to accomplish this...

    Authors: Alexander Pertsemlidis and John W Fondon III
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reviews2002.1
  4. A report on the Ubiquitin and Intracellular Protein Degradation FASEB summer conference, Saxtons River, USA, 23-28 June 2001.

    Authors: Traci A Lee and Mike Tyers
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports4025.1
  5. A report on the 11th International Congress of Immunology, Stockholm, Sweden, 22-27 July 2001.

    Authors: Zoltan T Fehervari
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports4024.1
  6. A complete inventory of putative ATP-binding cassette proteins has been assembled from the Arabidopsis genomic sequence.

    Authors: Harish Chandran
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports0037
  7. All members of the species Plasmodium falciparum seem to have been derived from a single recent ancestor.

    Authors: S Subramanian
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports0036
  8. A 'protein chip' incorporating most of the yeast proteome can be used for the high-throughput characterization of proteins.

    Authors: Reiner Veitia
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports0035
  9. The Human Alternative Splicing DataBase (HASDB) contains information about many of the alternative splicing events that have so far been identified in humans.

    Authors: Steven G Gray
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports2014
  10. The Mouse SNP Database website contains a searchable depository of mouse single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

    Authors: Steven G Gray
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports2013
  11. The Universal Mutation Database (UMD) was developed to allow researchers interested in particular human disease genes to query gene-specific databases for mutational information in a dynamic and interactive fa...

    Authors: Steven G Gray
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports2012
  12. Metal ions are essential nutrients, yet they can also be toxic if they over-accumulate. Homeostatic mechanisms and detoxification systems therefore precisely control their intracellular levels and distribution...

    Authors: David J Eide
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reviews1028.1
  13. Analysis of the human genome draft sequences has revealed a more complete portrait of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in humans than was available previously. The new information provides a basis for de...

    Authors: Chiquito Crasto, Michael S Singer and Gordon M Shepherd
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reviews1027.1
  14. A report on the thirteenth international Caenorhabditis elegans meeting, University of California, Los Angeles, USA, 22-26 June 2001.

    Authors: Andrew G Fraser
    Citation: Genome Biology 2001 2:reports4022.1

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    12.3 - 2-year Impact Factor
    17.4 - 5-year Impact Factor
    3.476 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    9.249 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2023 Speed
    21 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    277 days submission to accept (Median)

    2023 Usage 
    6,688,476 downloads
    12,515 Altmetric mentions

Peer Review Taxonomy

This journal is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy, to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent. Further information on the pilot is available here.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

  • Identity transparency: Single anonymized
  • Reviewer interacts with: Editor
  • Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this short survey.