Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Genome Biology

Fig. 4

From: Impact of mouse contamination in genomic profiling of patient-derived models and best practice for robust analysis

Fig. 4

Performance of eight filtering methods measured in the benchmark dataset. a Sensitivity, specificity, and F-scores of eight filtering methods in terms of mouse read filtration. b Total sums of Hf reduction after filtration. c Numbers of callable HAMA (Hf > 5%, alternative allele count > 5) after filtration. d Numbers of mutation calls in high-risk HAMA and non-HAMA sites after filtration

Back to article page

Genome Biology

ISSN: 1474-760X

Contact us