Skip to main content

Table 4 Overhead of the Qtip tool

From: A tandem simulation framework for predicting mapping quality

   

Time (minutes)

Peak memory (gigabytes)

   

Time

+Qtip

% inc

Memory

+Qtip

% inc

ERR050082

Unpaired

Bowtie 2

23.58

25.20

6.89

3.26

3.52

8.25

  

BWA-MEM

22.18

23.75

7.08

7.53

7.79

3.40

  

SNAP

12.13

13.75

13.32

29.26

29.51

0.85

 

Paired

Bowtie 2

57.52

61.35

6.67

3.27

3.66

12.02

  

BWA-MEM

57.93

63.38

9.41

7.87

8.26

4.87

  

SNAP

11.28

14.42

27.69

30.21

30.55

1.14

ERR050083

Unpaired

Bowtie 2

23.02

24.75

7.55

3.26

3.53

8.28

  

BWA-MEM

24.60

26.08

6.03

7.75

8.01

3.33

  

SNAP

12.23

13.73

12.31

29.26

29.51

0.85

 

Paired

Bowtie 2

63.60

67.40

6.00

3.27

3.66

11.96

  

BWA-MEM

61.58

67.52

9.62

7.92

8.31

4.83

  

SNAP

11.95

14.68

22.86

30.21

30.55

1.14

  1. This is measured as the increase in running time (left) and peak memory footprint (right) from when the aligner runs by itself (Time) to when the aligner runs in combination with Qtip (+Qtip). % inc columns give the percentage increase. Times are in minutes and memory footprints are in gigabytes