- Open Access
Antagonizing Methuselah to extend life span
© BioMed Central Ltd 2007
- Published: 31 August 2007
A recent report describes the identification through the use of in vitro selection of a peptide that antagonizes Methuselah signaling in Drosophila in vitro and extends fly life span in vivo.
- Native Ligand
- Extend Life Span
- Maximum Life Span
- Orphan GPCRs
Like their biblical namesake, methuselah1 (mth1) mutant Drosophila melanogaster significantly outlive their wild-type peers. Aging, observed on a population level as a time-dependent increase in the probability of death, is delayed in homozygous mth1/mth1 flies, resulting in an approximately 35% increase in average and maximum life span of males at 29°C, the basis on which mth was identified and named . Almost a decade after the first report of the mth1 mutant, the function of the mth gene product and the mechanism by which it extends life span are still under intensive investigation, with the most recent study, by Ja and co-workers , reporting an antagonist of mth function that extends life span.
The longevity phenotype of mth1 has been observed to depend on the sex of the flies, the temperature at which the experiment is conducted , food source and mating status , and is greatest in males at 29°C on a highly nutritious medium. Life-span extension is accompanied by a reduction in reproductive output, sensitivity to cold  and increased resistance to a superoxide-generating drug (paraquat), heat stress or starvation [1, 4]. A clue to the cellular role of mth comes from observations that mth controls synaptic efficacy at neuromuscular junctions . Furthermore, mth plays an essential role in the fly, as null alleles are not viable . How these phenotypes are connected, as well as the nature of their interaction with the environment, remain unclear. To answer these questions, an insight into the molecular and cellular functioning of the Methuselah protein (Mth) is required.
mth encodes a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) . GPCRs comprise a large family of integral membrane proteins that respond to extracellular cues by activating intracellular signaling pathways through the regulation of heterotrimeric G proteins. GPCRs have a common protein architecture, with an amino-terminal extracellular domain, which is held to be mainly responsible for ligand binding, followed by seven transmembrane domains, linked by three extra- and three intracellular loops, and an intracellular carboxy-terminal domain . The native ligand of Mth, the product of the stunted (sun) gene, has been identified and sun mutants also display an extension of life span . The signaling pathway within which Mth functions has not yet been elucidated.
mth is a part of a larger puzzle, as it is now clear that alterations in many genes encoding signal transduction proteins result in longevity. Indeed, it appears that several interacting signal-transduction pathways, including insulin/insulin-like growth factor, target of rapamycin (TOR) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathways, control animal physiology in such a way that modulating them can extend life span [8–11]. Mutations in the components of these pathways in model organisms such as D. melanogaster are being used intensively to probe the biology of aging. Unfortunately, there is often a wide gap between the wealth of knowledge of the genetics of the pathways and their biochemical functioning within a given model organism. In their recent publication in Nature Chemical Biology, Ja et al.  make a significant contribution to bridging that gap for Drosophila Mth.
Ja et al.  set off to uncover artificial ligands for Mth, peptides that would interact with its ectodomain and hence might modulate the activity of the receptor, using an in vitro selection method developed previously . The authors created a DNA library encoding random peptides of 27 amino acids. The library was transcribed in vitro and the resulting mRNAs fused to a peptide acceptor at their 3' ends. During the subsequent in vitro translation of the messages, the ribosomes were cheated into covalently attaching the nascent peptide onto its cognate mRNA. Hence, the chimeric molecules in the library contained both the functional part (the peptide) that allowed selection based on its capacity to bind the purified Mth ectodomain, and the informational part (mRNA) that allowed for amplification of the selected peptides. The authors started with an initial library containing approximately 1013 peptides and performed eight rounds of enrichment and amplification. To reduce the occurrence of 'sticky' peptides that may be nonspecifically retained on the Mth-binding column, the last four rounds included pre-clearing of peptides and specific elution with free Mth.
After the last round of amplification, Ja et al.  recovered ten unique peptides with high binding affinities for the Mth ecodomain (Kd values as low as 18 nM). Interestingly, all the peptides contained a simple (R/P)XXWXXR motif and, by mutation of the tryptophan (W) or the initial arginine (R) in one of the peptides, the authors demonstrated that this motif is required for binding. The simplicity of the motif precluded any meaningful identification of Drosophila proteins as potential native ligands.
As well as providing an important insight into the molecular functioning of the receptor, the identification of a peptide antagonist of Mth demonstrates that peptides with biologically relevant activity towards GPCRs, an important class of drug targets , can be obtained by in vitro selection of mRNA-peptide fusions. Furthermore, a multitude of orphan GPCRs are present in animal genomes  and the elucidation of their function will be aided by an unbiased identification of modulators of their activity. Most importantly for aging research, Ja and co-workers  have provided us with a biochemically characterized tool for the examination of the in vivo function of Mth.
The authors initiated the examination of the effects of the Mth antagonist in vivo. They expressed an RWR peptide under the control of the GAL4 transcription factor that was in turn expressed from the daughterless promoter. This ubiquitous expression of the antagonist led to extension of life span of males at 29°C and 25°C. The result indicates that the RWR peptide can antagonize the activity of Mth in vivo. Indeed, mutations in the RWR motif, critical for binding to Mth in vitro, abolished the life span extension. It is still possible that the peptide may act through another GPCR, however, as the specificity of the peptide for Mth among Drosophila GPCRs, including 12 Mth paralogs, is unknown, making it important to examine the genetic interactions between mth and its agonist and antagonist. It will also be reassuring to see that the effect of the antagonist on life span is robust to placing the transgenes into a standard genetic background.
The authors carried out the life-span experiment under conditions in which the effect of modulating Mth activity should be most pronounced. Because the effect of mth1 appears to depend on environmental conditions, mating status and the sex of the flies, it will be interesting to expand on the initial findings of Ja and co-workers , including the examination of the effects of the antagonist in different genetic backgrounds. Indeed, the antagonist may prove useful in establishing mechanistic links between the environmental conditions and mth1 phenotypes, as well as the connections between different phenotypes.
In the system the authors used, the peptide was not targeted for excretion, while the receptor binding site is extracellular. This would imply that the peptide engages the receptor before extracellular presentation of the ectodomain. If this is the case, the antagonist will only affect the Mth in the cell that expresses it: it will be acting autonomously. It will be interesting to know if the secreted version of the peptide can act in a cell-nonautonomous manner. And conversely, the system that is described by Ja et al.  may provide a tool for the examination of physiological outcomes of tissue-restricted Mth inhibition.
At least 30% of currently available drugs act on GPCRs . Ja and co-workers  demonstrated that a targeted design of an artificial modulator of GPCR activity could extend life span. Although Mth has no homologs in humans, is it likely that a modulator of a signaling pathway could be used as a drug to delay aging? It will probably not be as simple as that. Signaling pathways that affect aging in model organisms have pleiotropic effects. Many of these would be undesirable in humans, including the reduced reproductive output in mth1 flies, or the diabetic phenotypes in long-lived flies with reduced production of insulin-like peptides . Furthermore, mth1 is an interesting example of the fact that a longer life span need not mean a healthier old age; the delay in aging, observed in the mth1 mutants on a population level, appears to be uncoupled from a delay in age-related functional decline in olfaction and motor activity [17, 18]. Much further work is required to gain a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie ageing, and the reagents developed by Ja and co-workers  will help just that.
We acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust Functional Genomic Analysis of Ageing Grant (LP) and European Molecular Biology Organization Long-Term Fellowship (NA). We thank M Piper for a critical reading of the manuscript and WW Ja and RW Roberts for their help in obtaining the image of the Mth ectodomain.
- Lin YJ, Seroude L, Benzer S: Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methuselah. Science. 1998, 282: 943-946. 10.1126/science.282.5390.943.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ja WW, West AP, Delker SL, Bjorkman PJ, Benzer S, Roberts RW: Extension of Drosophila melanogaster life span with a GPCR peptide inhibitor. Nat Chem Biol. 2007, 3: 415-419. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mockett RJ, Sohal RS: Temperature-dependent trade-offs between longevity and fertility in the Drosophila mutant, methuselah. Exp Gerontol. 2006, 41: 566-573. 10.1016/j.exger.2006.03.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baldal EA, Baktawar W, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ: Methuselah life history in a variety of conditions, implications for the use of mutants in longevity research. Exp Gerontol. 2006, 41: 1126-1135. 10.1016/j.exger.2006.08.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song W, Ranjan R, Dawson-Scully K, Bronk P, Marin L, Seroude L, Lin YJ, Nie Z, Atwood HL, Benzer S, et al: Presynaptic regulation of neurotransmission in Drosophila by the G protein-coupled receptor methuselah. Neuron. 2002, 36: 105-119. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00932-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harmar AJ: Family-B G-protein-coupled receptors. Genome Biol. 2001, 2: reviews3013.1-3013.10. 10.1186/gb-2001-2-12-reviews3013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cvejic S, Zhu Z, Felice SJ, Berman Y, Huang XY: The endogenous ligand Stunted of the GPCR Methuselah extends lifespan in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol. 2004, 6: 540-546. 10.1038/ncb1133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tatar M, Kopelman A, Epstein D, Tu MP, Yin CM, Garofalo RS: A mutant Drosophila insulin receptor homolog that extends life-span and impairs neuroendocrine function. Science. 2001, 292: 107-110. 10.1126/science.1057987.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clancy DJ, Gems D, Harshman LG, Oldham S, Stocker H, Hafen E, Leevers SJ, Partridge L: Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science. 2001, 292: 104-106. 10.1126/science.1057991.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapahi P, Zid BM, Harper T, Koslover D, Sapin V, Benzer S: Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 885-890. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.059.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang MC, Bohmann D, Jasper H: JNK signaling confers tolerance to oxidative stress and extends lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2003, 5: 811-816. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00323-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roberts RW, Szostak JW: RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 12297-12302. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12297.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- West AP, Llamas LL, Snow PM, Benzer S, Bjorkman PJ: Crystal structure of the ectodomain of Methuselah, a Drosophila G protein-coupled receptor associated with extended lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 3744-3749. 10.1073/pnas.051625298.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wise A, Gearing K, Rees S: Target validation of G-protein coupled receptors. Drug Discov Today. 2002, 7: 235-246. 10.1016/S1359-6446(01)02131-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howard AD, McAllister G, Feighner SD, Liu Q, Nargund RP, Van der Ploeg LH, Patchett AA: Orphan G-protein-coupled receptors and natural ligand discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001, 22: 132-140. 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01636-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Broughton SJ, Piper MD, Ikeya T, Bass TM, Jacobson J, Driege Y, Martinez P, Hafen E, Withers DJ, Leevers SJ, et al: Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 3105-3110. 10.1073/pnas.0405775102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook-Wiens E, Grotewiel MS: Dissociation between functional senescence and oxidative stress resistance in Drosophila. Exp Gerontol. 2002, 37: 1347-1357. 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00096-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petrosyan A, Hsieh IH, Saberi K: Age-dependent stability of sensorimotor functions in the life-extended Drosophila mutant methuselah. Behav Genet. 2007, 37: 585-594. 10.1007/s10519-007-9159-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar